ACI-NA Joins Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative
On October 23 and 24,
2006, an aviation alternative fuels workshop sponsored by the
Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuels Initiative (CAAFI) was held at
the campus of Georgia Tech in Atlanta. CAAFI is a joint effort being
undertaken by ACI-NA, AIAA, ATA and FAA.
The workshop brought
together approximately 80 representatives of airlines, airframe and
engine manufacturers, fuel suppliers, academics and regulators to
exchange information about the current status of alternative aviation
fuels and lay out plans for their future development and introduction
into service as supplements or substitutes for traditional
petroleum-based Jet-A. The workshop also identified related research
needs for FAA's aviation environmental Center of Excellence, called
PARTNER.
Given the recent price volatility of jet-A, renewed
research into alternative fuels has been underway in various forums.
Two prospects seem viable, to differing degrees. The most promising
process is called the Fisher-Tropsch (F-T) process, which is a modern
variant on the method used to produce large quantities of aviation fuel
by Germany during WWII and by South Africa during the apartheid
embargoes.
F-T fuel is thought to be very likely to be
interchangeable with jet-A in aircraft and fuel supply infrastructure,
although additional research is needed to fully confirm this. F-T fuel
can be derived from natural gas, coal, oil tars, shale oil or other
petroleum feed stocks. Because of abundant supplies, coal is a favorite
candidate for production, but the biggest issue to be addressed with
F-T fuels derived from coal is the large amount of CO2 released during
the gasification stage.
Aside from the emission of large
amounts of CO2 that would need sequestration during production, F-T
fuel offers the potential to reduce emissions of SOx, HC, NOx, CO2 and
particulates when it is burned, which would be highly advantageous for
airports struggling with air quality issues.
The second
prospective alternative fuel is a variant on bio-diesel, designed for
use in aircraft. The bio-fuel has the advantage of not producing so
much CO2 during production and of being seen as renewable. However,
there are unresolved questions about the total energy required to make
bio-fuel, the land use impacts of large scale production and difficulty
in meeting the fuel freeze point requirement for aviation use.
Also,
bio-fuels are not likely to be substantially better than current jet-A
at reducing criteria pollutants when burned (with the possible
exception of SOx). However, if bio-fuel is used as an F-T feed stock,
the
F-T advantages of reducing emissions can be achieved, although at lower yields and higher costs.
The
U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) has a major interest in alternative
fuels to reduce dependence on foreign supplies and assure fuel
security. DOD is sponsoring considerable research and is issuing an RFP
for 200 million gallons per year for several years with the intent of
operationally evaluating a 50% mix across their fleet through 2011.
Commercial
airlines are interested in having stable fuel pricing, in the face of
recent past price increases and volatility and indicated their interest
would be drive largely by price stability. Major airlines, including
Virgin Atlantic and Jet Blue have expressed their support for the
effort.
Airports seem to have two primary interests: the
potential for reduced LTO emissions and assuring compatibility with
existing airport fuel storage and distribution infrastructure. The
workshop identified research needs in both areas, which are either
underway or need future funding.
For additional information, contact Dick Marchi.




